<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adams &#38; Edens, P.A. &#124; Mississippi Divorce Law Blog &#187; Mississippi Child Supprt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/category/mississippi-child-supprt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Divorce Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Taxation of Child Support and Alimony in Mississippi</title>
		<link>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/11/11/taxation-of-child-support-and-alimony/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/11/11/taxation-of-child-support-and-alimony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Supprt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Tax Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi divorce Joint Accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Issues in Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No-Fault Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In divorce cases, there is a common misunderstanding among divorcing spouses about the taxation issues associated with payments for both child support and alimony.   
Child support is defined by the Internal Revenue Code as a &#8220;payment which the terms of the divorce or separation instrument fix (in terms of an amount of money or a part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In divorce cases, there is a common misunderstanding among divorcing spouses about the taxation issues associated with payments for both child support and alimony.   </p>
<p>Child support is defined by the <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000071----000-.html">Internal Revenue Code </a>as a &#8220;payment which the terms of the divorce or separation instrument fix (in terms of an amount of money or a part of the payment) as a sum which is payable for the support of children of the payor spouse.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000071----000-.html">26 U.S.C.A.  71(c)(1).  </a>Basically, child support is a payment ordered in a divorce decree that the divorce decree labels as child support.  There are situations where payments labeled as &#8220;child supprt&#8221; may not qualify as child support but we won&#8217;t get into those right now.  The tax code treats any payment of child support, so long as it meets the requirements of <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000071----000-.html">Section 71</a>, as a non-taxable event, meaning that the receiving spouse does not include the child support in gross income (which means it is received tax-free) and the paying spouse receives no deduction for the payment of child support.  <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000071----000-.html">26 U.S.C.A.  71</a>. </p>
<p>Alimony, on the other hand, is considered income to the receiving spouse (must pay taxes on it just as if earned at a job) and may be considered a deduction by the paying spouse.  <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000071----000-.html">26 U.S.C.A. 71</a>.  There are situations where the Internal Revenue Service may consider a spouse to be receiving alimony even if the payment is not called alimony.  Obviously, this would be a huge problem if the receiving spouse had not been including the alimony payments on her income tax return.  We&#8217;ll get into alimony is more detail in a later post.</p>
<p>Many people try to prepare their own divorce documents to save money on legal fees but often their efforts to save money result in unintended tax consequences.  It definitely pays in the long run to get the divorce documents drafted correctly.  You do not want to find out during an audit that the tax-free money you&#8217;ve been receiving is not really tax-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/11/11/taxation-of-child-support-and-alimony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factors Courts Use in Mississippi to Determine Custody</title>
		<link>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/10/23/factors-courts-use-in-determining-custody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/10/23/factors-courts-use-in-determining-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Support Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Supprt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Grounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chancery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Mississippi, a decision on which parent is awarded custody of children is a complicated process that involves the consideration of a number of very important factors, some of which are more important than others.  The factors are commonly referred to as the &#8220;Albright Factors&#8221; because they were set forth in the case Albright v. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Mississippi, a decision on which parent is awarded custody of children is a complicated process that involves the consideration of a number of very important factors, some of which are more important than others.  The factors are commonly referred to as the &#8220;<strong>Albright Factors</strong>&#8221; because they were set forth in the case <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Albright v. Albright</span>, 437 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. 1983).  In <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Albright</span>, the Mississippi Supreme Court held:</p>
<p><em>We reaffirm the rule that the polestar consideration in child custody cases is the best interest and welfare of the child. The age of the child is subordinated to that rule and is but one factor to be considered. Age should carry no greater weight than other factors to be considered, such as: health, and sex of the child; a determination of the parent that has had the continuity of care prior to the separation; which has the best parenting skills and which has the willingness and capacity to provide primary child care; the employment of the parent and responsibilities of that employment; physical and mental health and age of the parents; emotional ties of parent and child; moral fitness of parents; the home, school and community record of the child; the preference of the child at the age sufficient to express a preference by law; stability of home environment and employment of each parent, and other factors relevant to the parent-child relationship. </em></p>
<p><em>Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards. Relative financial situations is not controlling since the duty to support is independent of the right to custody. Differences in religion, personal values and lifestyles should not be the sole basis for custody decisions.</em></p>
<p>If you are involved in a custody situation or are thinking about filing for divorce, a review of the Albright Factors could assist you in undertanding what information is important to the judge.  However, it is critical that you discuss your situation with an attorney immediately if you feel custody will be an issue.  Failing to get sound legal advice as soon as possible could cause you to unknowingly engage in behavior that will hurt your ability to obtain custody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/10/23/factors-courts-use-in-determining-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Priest, a Stripper and Child Support</title>
		<link>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/10/08/a-priest-a-stripper-and-custody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/10/08/a-priest-a-stripper-and-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Support Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Child Supprt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Grounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chancery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paternity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankin County Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restraining Order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article was posted on FOX News this morning that leaves you waiting for the punchline.  Unfortunately, it is not a joke.  The headline reads, &#8220;Florida Priest Seeks Custody of Child From Stripper.&#8221;   The article needs no explanation other than to say that issues pertaining to custody of children and child support know no societal, economic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,562361,00.html?test=latestnews">article</a> was posted on <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/">FOX News</a> this morning that leaves you waiting for the punchline.  Unfortunately, it is not a joke.  The headline reads, &#8220;<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,562361,00.html?test=latestnews">Florida Priest Seeks Custody of Child From Stripper</a>.&#8221;   The <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,562361,00.html?test=latestnews">article</a> needs no explanation other than to say that issues pertaining to custody of children and child support know no societal, economic or professional boundaries and that when you think you&#8217;ve heard it all, you soon realize that you have not.  A link to a more thorough article on the matter is <a href="http://www.wsvn.com/news/articles/local/MI133382/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mississippidivorcelawblog.com/2009/10/08/a-priest-a-stripper-and-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
