This isn’t really divorce related, but worth addressing.  Wesley Snipes looks like he’ll be spending the next few years in prison for tax evasion. He was convicted of tax evasion but while he appealed the conviction he was out on bail.  Now that the appeal is concluded, so is his freedom, at least for a while.  While Snipes intentionally sought to evade taxation, and will pay a heavy price, normal people can find themselves with a financially devastating tax situation if they neglect their taxes.  While not a criminal offense normally, failing to file returns or to pay the required tax results in penalties and interest and a debt collector that you really can’t hang up on.  In the middle of a divorce, the last thing a divorcing person needs is delinquent tax debt.  File your returns, pay your taxes and avoid significant financial consequences.  Remember – the IRS will still be married to you even if your spouse is not.

The typical scenario when a spouse learns that the other has done something that destroys the marriage is that the innocent spouse meets with a lawyer, who guides the spouse through the divorce process.  Occasionally, though, you find that while listening to the “outrage” that a client expresses over learning that their spouse has had an affair you also learn that your “innocent” client has also been having an affair.  So what do you do if a client wants a divorce but both spouses are committing adultery?  An agreed resolution on the ground of Irreconcilable Differences would be the preferable outcome, but litigation may be the only option in some circumstances.

The Mississippi Supreme Court recently addressed a similar scenario in Jenkins v. Jenkins.  In Jenkins, the court was faced with a situation where the lower court granted a person a divorce on the ground of Habitual, Cruel and Inhuman Treatment.  The guilty spouse tried to defend the charge by claiming the defense of “recrimination”, which is a common-law defense that states if each party proves a fault ground for divorce then neither is entitled to a divorce.  The defense of recrimination has been altered by Miss. Code Ann. 93-5-3, which allows a court to grant a divorce, even if both parties prove a fault ground for divorce, by determining which spouse’s actions constituted the proximate cause of the destruction of the marriage.  The Mississippi Supreme Court determined that although the wife admitted committing adultery, the trial evidence showed that the husband’s habitual, cruel and inhuman treatment was the cause of the divorce, not the wife’s adultery, and that the lower court properly denied the husband’s recrimination defense.

Although a scenario where both parties are committing actions that constitute divorce grounds is not the preferable situation, a spouse may still be able to obtain a divorce without his/her spouse’s consent if the facts are supportive.  If you find yourself in this situation, speaking with an attorney to help analyze the proximate cause of the destruction of the marriage very early on is vital.

In Mississippi, a decision on which parent is awarded custody of children is a complicated process that involves the consideration of a number of very important factors, some of which are more important than others.  The factors are commonly referred to as the “Albright Factors” because they were set forth in the case Albright v. Albright, 437 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. 1983).  In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court held:

We reaffirm the rule that the polestar consideration in child custody cases is the best interest and welfare of the child. The age of the child is subordinated to that rule and is but one factor to be considered. Age should carry no greater weight than other factors to be considered, such as: health, and sex of the child; a determination of the parent that has had the continuity of care prior to the separation; which has the best parenting skills and which has the willingness and capacity to provide primary child care; the employment of the parent and responsibilities of that employment; physical and mental health and age of the parents; emotional ties of parent and child; moral fitness of parents; the home, school and community record of the child; the preference of the child at the age sufficient to express a preference by law; stability of home environment and employment of each parent, and other factors relevant to the parent-child relationship.

Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards. Relative financial situations is not controlling since the duty to support is independent of the right to custody. Differences in religion, personal values and lifestyles should not be the sole basis for custody decisions.

If you are involved in a custody situation or are thinking about filing for divorce, a review of the Albright Factors could assist you in undertanding what information is important to the judge.  However, it is critical that you discuss your situation with an attorney immediately if you feel custody will be an issue.  Failing to get sound legal advice as soon as possible could cause you to unknowingly engage in behavior that will hurt your ability to obtain custody.

An article was posted on FOX News this morning that leaves you waiting for the punchline.  Unfortunately, it is not a joke.  The headline reads, “Florida Priest Seeks Custody of Child From Stripper.”   The article needs no explanation other than to say that issues pertaining to custody of children and child support know no societal, economic or professional boundaries and that when you think you’ve heard it all, you soon realize that you have not.  A link to a more thorough article on the matter is here.

To get a divorce in Mississippi, spouses must either agree on a divorce on the ground of irreconcilable differences or prove that one of the causes for divorce that are specified in Miss. Code Section 93-5-1 exist.  The causes for divorce listed in Section 93-5-1 are:

1.  Natural Impotency

2.  Adultery

3. Being sentenced to any penitentiary, and not pardoned before being sent there

4.  Willful, continued and obstinate desertion for the space of one (1) year

5. Habitual drunkenness

6. Habitual and excessive use of opium, morphine or other like drug

7. Habitual cruel and inhuman treatment

8. Mental illness or mental retardation at the time of marriage, if the party complaining did not know of that infirmity

9. Marriage to some other person at the time of the pretended marriage between the parties

10. Pregnancy of the wife by another person at the time of the marriage, if the husband did not know of the pregnancy

11. Either party may have a divorce if they are related to each other within the degrees of kindred whom marriage is prohibited by law

12. Incurable mental illness

Obviously, some of the divorce grounds are going to be more frequently used than others.  For example, adultery and habitual, cruel and inhuman treatment are the most commonly asserted grounds for divorce while others like natural impotency and being related to one another are very seldomly asserted.

In later posts, we’ll discuss in more detail the individual grounds for divorce and what constitutes each ground.  If you are considering a divorce, a quick review of the allowable divorce grounds should provide an overview of what circumstances need to exist in order to get a divorce without the consent of your spouse.