by Jake Adams
So you just got a visit from the constable and he served you with a divorce complaint. In it, much to your surprise, you see that your spouse accused you of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment. It sounds really bad, and you’re offended and hurt that you’ve been accused of it. Sure, you recall your fair share of arguments and disagreements, but you don’t remember ever being cruel or inhuman.
Relax. Chances are you weren’t.
Habitual cruel and inhuman treatment is a ground for divorce that is overused and often misapplied. The law in Mississippi makes it very difficult to have a ground for divorce, and cruel and inhuman treatment is the most nebulous or ambiguous one on the list. Lawyers will often allege cruel and inhuman treatment simply because there is nothing else that remotely applies.
So what is cruel and inhuman treatment?
To establish cruel and inhuman treatment you or your spouse must prove the other’s conduct either:
1) Endangers life, limb or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief or
2) be so unnatural and infamous as to make the marriage revolting to the [offended] spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of the marriage, thus destroying the basis for its continuance.
It’s a pretty high bar, and the Mississippi Supreme Court has said in order to prove habitual cruel and inhuman treatment it takes more that mere unkindness, rudeness, petty indignities, frivolous quarrels, incompatibility or lack of affection.
If you’ve been accused of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment consult an attorney as soon as possible.
