Posts Tagged ‘Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer’

After Divorce, What’s the Best Way to Provide for My Children In the Event of My Death?

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

In divorce settings where minor children are involved, it is not unusual for the court to order one or both parents to maintain a life insurance policy providing for the needs of the children through the age of majority (and, in some cases, beyond) in case a parent meets an untimely death.  And most people understand this requirement and don’t have a problem complying; however, most people in this situation question whether the life insurance proceeds will be available for use by the other parent and want to avoid that possibility.  As a result, they are tempted to name their minor children as direct beneficiaries of the life insurance proceeds.  This is not sound practice and should be avoided.

Under Mississippi law, a minor child is not capable of exercising possession or control of life insurance proceeds.  Where minor children are listed as direct beneficiaries of life insurance proceeds, and following the death of the insured parent, the life insurance carrier will be required to file a formal guardianship lawsuit so that a judge, and no one else, oversees the receipt, deposit, investment and expenditure of all life insurance proceeds.  The guardianship lawsuit would remain active throughout the minority status of the child.  Court Guardianships are cumbersome, expensive and fraught with legal limitations.

Some will say that this situation can be avoided by naming a Grandparent or friend as the direct beneficiary instead.  However, this does not technically comply with the divorce court’s order which requires that the minor children be protected.  Under Mississippi law, a directly named beneficiary under a life insurance policy becomes the legal owner of the insurance proceeds in the event of the death of the insured.  There would be no legal prohibition on the beneficiary to spend those proceeds for the benefit of the minor children, and nothing stopping the beneficiary from using the proceeds for personal gain.

The better practice is to create a Last Will and Testament having trust provisions that name a trustee of the life insurance proceeds (and other estate assets as well).  The trust language of the Will establishes the responsibility of the trustee to protect the interests of the minor children.  Because there is an appointed trustee, there is no need for further court intervention.  The actual trust that is created by the Last Will and Testament may be named as the beneficiary of the required life insurance policy.  In this way, in the event of death, the life insurance proceeds are “owned” by the trust created by the Last Will and Testament, and the life insurance company is authorized to pay the proceeds over to the trustee named in the Will without the need for further court intervention.

The professionals at Adams & Edens, P.A., are familiar with both Mississippi divorce law and Mississippi estate planning.  Let us help you navigate the uncertainty that results when faced with divorce.

Are Retirement Accounts Marital Property?

Friday, July 1st, 2011

by Jake Adams

Generally speaking, retirement accounts accumulated during the marriage are marital property subject to equitable division in a divorce. However, portions of retirement accounts that exist prior to the marriage or can be attributable to one of the parties’ separate estates outside the marriage are not marital property.

Considering Divorce? Think About the Money

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

by Jake Adams

One of the most problematic aspects of divorce (aside from child custody) is money. There’s often not enough to go around. If you are considering divorce be realistic about your finances and plan ahead. One way to be prepared is to read informative articles like this one regarding common money mistakes made during divorce.

Make Sure Your Divorce Judgment is Final or Get it Certified

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

by Jake Adams

This post is for you Mississippi divorce lawyers out there.

In S.E.B. v. R.E.B., No. 2010-CA-00074-COA, a Hinds County divorce action, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction where the Judge declined to rule on the issue of child support in making her ruling in her judgment of divorce. “Due to (wife) not being employed at this time, the issue of child support will not be ruled on until such time in the future as the Court deems proper,” the Hinds County Chancellor wrote in the judgment.

Any time a divorce attorney sees the words “will not be ruled on until such time in the future,” in a judgment the red flags need to start waving that an appeal will require certification pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).  There was no such certification in this case and the appeal was dismissed.

Unproven Claims of Sexual Abuse Cause Mother to Lose Custody in Divorce

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

by Jake Adams

In White v. White, No. 2009-CA-01701-COA, the Mississippi Court of Appeals upheld a custody award to father in an Alcorn County divorce matter where allegations of sexual abuse were made by wife against the paternal grandfather. The Chancery Court eventually found that no credible evidence existed that the sexual abuse occurred. In making its Albright findings, the Court found that the child’s well-being had been negatively impacted by the sexual-abuse allegations and that the factor regarding health of the children favored the father because of it. As to the parenting skills factor, the Court found that wife’s pursuit of the sexual-abuse allegations in part caused this factor to favor the father. The court was of the belief that wife and a grandmother were planting information of sexual abuse in the child’s mind. As a result, husband/father was awarded custody.

This is a case where unproven allegations of sexual abuse of a child harmed the accusing parent.

Does My Spouse’s Adultery Mean I Get Custody of the Children?

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

by Jake Adams

You either caught your spouse cheating or your spouse caught you. Divorce is imminent. Does the “guilty” spouse lose custody of the kids because of his or her adultery? Not necessarily.

There are many factors contemplated by the court in determining child custody. These are known as the Albright Factors, – a custody test provided by the Mississippi Supreme Court in 1983. As to marital fault, Albright specifically says:

Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards.

The Supreme Court wants the best interest of the children to prevail, and in Albright, it recognized that in some cases the better parent is not necessarily the better spouse.  So, marital fault in and of itself is not the dagger to custody hopes many people believe. However, in some cases the underlying behavior that leads to the finding of marital fault is critical. For example, in the case of a parent who participates in an adulterous relationship in the presence of his or her child, the Court will most likely find against that spouse as to “moral fitness of the parent” – a key Albright factor.

If you have questions concerning marital fault and custody, speak to an attorney as soon as possible.

What is cruel and inhuman treatment?

Friday, June 24th, 2011

by Jake Adams

So you just got a visit from the constable and he served you with a divorce complaint. In it, much to your surprise, you see that your spouse accused you of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment. It sounds really bad, and you’re offended and hurt that you’ve been accused of it. Sure, you recall your fair share of arguments and disagreements, but you don’t remember ever being cruel or inhuman.

Relax. Chances are you weren’t.

Habitual cruel and inhuman treatment is a ground for divorce that is overused and often misapplied. The law in Mississippi makes it very difficult to have a ground for divorce, and cruel and inhuman treatment is the most nebulous or ambiguous one on the list. Lawyers will often allege cruel and inhuman treatment simply because there is nothing else that remotely applies.

So what is cruel and inhuman treatment?

To establish cruel and inhuman treatment you or your spouse must prove the other’s conduct either:

1) Endangers life, limb or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief or

2) be so unnatural and infamous as to make the marriage revolting to the [offended] spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of the marriage, thus destroying the basis for its continuance.

It’s a pretty high bar, and the Mississippi Supreme Court has said in order to prove habitual cruel and inhuman treatment it takes more that mere unkindness, rudeness, petty indignities, frivolous quarrels, incompatibility or lack of affection.

If you’ve been accused of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment consult an attorney as soon as possible.

Do I Need a Lawyer?

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Can’t I get a divorce by just filling out some forms?  I saw online where I can get the divorce forms for a lot less than the cost of a lawyer, is that a bad idea?  These are questions that come up periodically and the answer to both questions is “yes.”  To explain, a no-fault divorce can be very simple for a lawyer to put together for a client and can take very little time by the lawyer to do so.  But, the final product you see is the culmination of years of education, experience and familiarity with the differing requirements of chancery court judges along with careful drafting of documents that address the client’s unique circumstances  For divorces, there is no “one size fits all” form.

Proper preparation of divorce documents is critical.  Lawyers look at both the immediate goal of obtaining a divorce as well as the long-term consequences of the divorce judgment.  Usually, parties that try to get divorced without the benefit of a lawyer create documents that are so awful, they often end up being completely unenforceable or void.  If that happens, it is almost certain that the parties will end up paying much more money in legal fees to repair the mess that they would spent to do it correctly in the first place.

The decisions you make in a divorce, and the documents that result, can control aspects of your family for tens of years and drastically impact your finances and property.  Nothing that important should be relegated to a do-it-yourself kit.  While there are certainly legal documents you can create without a lawyer that will serve you well, in a divorce, there are no short cuts.  Do it right the first time to avoid major problems in the long-term.

How do I Increase or Decrease Child Support Payments?

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

by Chris Palmer

When child support payments are set by court order and there is a desire to either increase or decrease the amount of the payments, the person seeking the change must show that a substantial and material change in the  circumstances of either the parents or the child has occurred since the date of the child support judgment.  The process is begun by the party seeking the modification filing a Complaint for Modification and having it, along with a summons and court date, served on the defendant.  In reviewing a request to change the child support amount, the court considers the increased needs of older children, higher expenses, a child’s medical needs, the parents’ financial situation, the health and needs of the parents, the monthly living expenses of the party ordered to pay child support, the parents’ tax obligations, the respective costs of each party’s residence and any other facts and circumstances the court considers relevant.  However, the most common reason for either party seeking a change in child support amount is a change in the payor’s income.

A modification cannot relitigate issues already decided in the original decree.  Modifications must be based on facts that occurred after the court established the original child support order.  If you were not satisfied with the original order then the remedy was to ask the court to reconsider and/or appeal the decision, but there are strict time frames in which that must be done.  Also, the change in circumstances sought to be used as the basis for a change in child support amount must be unanticipated at the time of the original decree.

Lifestyle decisions cannot be used to justify a child support modification.  For example, a payor cannot purchase a new car and then claim he should pay less child support because the car loan is too expensive.  Additionally, a payor cannot have child support reduced because he or she decides to have more children.

Typically, a modification is brought because the person receiving child support discovers that the payor has received an increase in pay.  If so, a substantial increase in pay will justify a modification with the court considering the child support guidelines.  Likewise, if a payor receives a substantial decrease in pay, a downward modification may be appropriate.  However, if the payor created the decrease in pay, the situation may be a little more difficult to address because courts are traditionally reluctant to take child support away from a custodial parent simply because the payor wanted to take a lower paying job.  In those situations, the court is likely to pay close attention to the motivation behind the payor’s actions.

If a modification is sought, it is important to act quickly because a modification is generally only effective from the date of the complaint to modify (at the earliest) or the date of the court order modifying the amount.

How Do I Modify a Child Custody Order?

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

by Jake Adams

Mississippi law places a premium on stability in the life of the child. Therefore, once a custody order is in place, there are significant, but not insurmountable hurdles to successfully modifying a custody order.

In order to modify child custody, the noncustodial parent must prove as follows:

1. A material change in circumstances occurred in the custodial parent’s home since the most recent custody order;

2. the material change adversely affects the child; and

3. a modification of custody is in the best interest of the child.

All three elements must be established to modify a child custody order.