Posts Tagged ‘Jackson MS Divorce Lawyer’

Bible Belt States, Including Mississippi, Have Higher Divorce Rate

Monday, August 29th, 2011

by Jake Adams

Despite their  ”Bible Belt” status, Mississippi and other southern states have a higher rate of divorce than states in the Northeast. Surprising, right? Click here to read an article regarding the divorce findings of a U.S. Census Bureau report.

Some theorize that the South’s higher divorce rate is caused by getting married too young.  While I disagree with the writer’s underlying agenda to discredit the sexual values instilled by Christianity, the statistical variance between Southern divorce rates and Northeastern divorce rates should be studied. There may be a lesson to be learned from Northeasterner’s who routinely marry much later in life, the theory being that with age comes maturity, education, and a realistic approach to marriage. No one can argue that maturity, education and realism are necessary equipment for a successful marriage.

Is Divorce Your Best Option?

Friday, July 15th, 2011

Is divorce your best option?  It’s a question worth asking. But while it may be a strange topic to find on the website of a law firm that specializes in domestic relations cases, it is the very question that should be asked right off the bat by competent attorneys when counseling clients who are contemplating divorce.  Why?  Because divorce can be very messy.  Divorce can negatively impact children of the marriage.  Divorce can cause financial burdens that may deeply impact your future.  The outcome of a divorce case is uncertain.  And it may be that, in your situation, divorce is not your best option.

Given the emotional strain and uncertainty that you are already experiencing, shouldn’t the legal counsel you receive be determined by what is in your best interest and in the best interest of your children, even if it means that our recommendation is that you not proceed with a divorce filing?  Shouldn’t you feel comfortable knowing that the advice you receive is not determined by an attorney’s desire to take in a divorce case?  At Adams & Edens, P.A., we believe the role of your attorney should involve more than advocacy.  Your attorney should also be your counselor.  And as a counselor, your attorney should be well versed in Mississippi divorce law, but also well practiced in listening carefully to your circumstances, ask probing questions, and give you sound advice that is in your best interest.

When Does Flirting Become Cheating?

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

When does online or text flirting become cheating? That is not a simple question to answer in the context of a divorce but a recent article has articulated nine red flags that may indicate that more than flirting is occurring.  While none of the listed factors are proof that a spouse is cheating, they are an excellent indicator that more investigation is needed. In fact, a study indicated that the Internet is typically the first step toward the ultimate goal of real-life cheating.  If you suspect your spouse is cheating, call us immediately because you may need to act quickly to preserve evidence critical to your divorce.

Annulment of a Marriage

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Mississippi Code Ann. 93-7-1 states that, “All bigamous or incestuous marriages are void, and a declaration of nullity may be obtained at the suit of either party.”  A bigamous marriage is one in which one of the parties is already legally married to another.  An incestuous marriage is defined by Miss. Code Ann. 93-1-1, which states:

(1) The son shall not marry his grandmother, his mother, or his stepmother; the brother his sister; the father his daughter, or his legally adopted daughter, or his grand-daughter; the son shall not marry the daughter of his father begotten of his stepmother, or his aunt, being his father’s or mother’s sister, nor shall the children of brother or sister, or brothers and sisters intermarry being first cousins by blood. The father shall not marry his son’s widow; a man shall not marry his wife’s daughter, or his wife’s daughter’s daughter, or his wife’s son’s daughter, or the daughter of his brother or sister; and the like prohibition shall extend to females in the same degrees. All marriages prohibited by this subsection are incestuous and void.

(2) Any marriage between persons of the same gender is prohibited and null and void from the beginning. Any marriage between persons of the same gender that is valid in another jurisdiction does not constitute a legal or valid marriage in Mississippi.

Marriages that are founded on bigamy or incest are considered void  in Mississippi and may be set aside by either spouse or by third parties.  Once granted, an annulment is as if the marriage never occurred.

Mississippi Code 93-7-3 addresses situations where marriages are “voidable” by spouses but are not necessarily void unless one of the spouses raises the issue.  The statute lists five situations where a marriage is voidable if the situation exists at the time of marriage:

1.  Incurable impotency;

2.  Adjudicated mental illness or incompetence of either or both parties;

3.  Failure to meet licensing requirements if not followed by cohabitation;

4.  Lack of consent, whether through physical means, age, mental acuity, fraud or force, provided that the cause for annulment is brought within six months after discovery;

5.  Wife’s pregnancy by another, as long as the husband did not know of the pregnancy and the action is brought within six months after discovery of the pregnancy.

Children born from marriages that are annulled for reasons other than incest are considered legitimate and are governed by same rules applied in divorces.  Children born of an incestuous marriage are considered illegitimate.  Miss. Code Ann. 93-7-5.

Annulments are not as common as divorces and it is rare that a client is entitled to an annulment instead of a divorce.  However, if you feel that you may be entitled to an annulment, it is critical that you meet with an attorney immediately since there are time limitations as well as potential defenses that may prohibit an annulment.

Child Support Contempt Defense

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

The laws and procedures concerning the enforcement of child support orders greatly favor the person receiving the money.  But there are defenses.

Normally, the person receiving child  support simply alleges that child support was not properly paid and then it becomes the obligation of the payor to prove that payment was made or to prove a valid defense.  If payments were properly made, then the contempt action is dismissed.  If payments were not made, the person paying must prove a recognized and valid defense to the allegation of nonpayment in order to avoid being held in contempt of court.

One of the main defenses to a charge of contempt (other than proving payment) is that the nonpayment is based on an inability to pay the child support.  There has to be a genuine inability to pay and not a situation where the paying party overextended themselves through frivolous spending.  This means that the party must spend money on only basic needs and then apply everything else to the child support payment.  A defendant that claims inability to pay but on cross examination reveals the amount of money spent of non-necessities (beer, cigarettes, etc.) often leaves the courtroom in handcuffs.

Ambiguity in a child support award can also be a valid defense.  For example, a court order that requires a person to pay “14% of their monthly income” would be unenforceable and too ambiguous since it would be subject to multiple interpretations.  Support awards should contain a specific dollar amount in order to avoid ambiguity in interpretation.

While there are other valid and acceptable defenses, the best defense is to avoid getting behind in the payment of child support in the first place.  Finding yourself on the wrong side of a contempt complaint can result in incarceration, wage garnishment and having to pay the other party’s legal fees.   If finances create the necessity of a “financial juggling act” when monthly bills come due, it is far better to not pay a credit card bill than it is to not pay child support.

Considering Divorce? Think About the Money

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

by Jake Adams

One of the most problematic aspects of divorce (aside from child custody) is money. There’s often not enough to go around. If you are considering divorce be realistic about your finances and plan ahead. One way to be prepared is to read informative articles like this one regarding common money mistakes made during divorce.

May My Child Decide the Parent with Whom He or She Wants to Live?

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

by Jake Adams

In a Mississippi divorce proceeding, if your child is 12 years old or older and both parents are determined to be fit and proper persons to have custody, the judge may consider the child’s parental preference in determining the custody arrangement that is in his or her best interest. It’s important to note that the child’s preference is only one Albright factor the court considers among many others. It is not uncommon for a court to award custody to the other parent. In either case, the court is required by statute to place on the record the reason or reasons for which the award for custody was made and is further required to explain in detail why the wishes of the child were or were not honored.

A Mississippi court may also hear the preference of the child 12 years old or older in a custody modification proceeding. However, the desire of the child alone is not enough to modify a custody order. The court must first find a material change in circumstances which adversely affects the welfare of the child before he can consider the child’s preference in a child custody modification proceeding.

Make Sure Your Divorce Judgment is Final or Get it Certified

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

by Jake Adams

This post is for you Mississippi divorce lawyers out there.

In S.E.B. v. R.E.B., No. 2010-CA-00074-COA, a Hinds County divorce action, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction where the Judge declined to rule on the issue of child support in making her ruling in her judgment of divorce. “Due to (wife) not being employed at this time, the issue of child support will not be ruled on until such time in the future as the Court deems proper,” the Hinds County Chancellor wrote in the judgment.

Any time a divorce attorney sees the words “will not be ruled on until such time in the future,” in a judgment the red flags need to start waving that an appeal will require certification pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).  There was no such certification in this case and the appeal was dismissed.

Unproven Claims of Sexual Abuse Cause Mother to Lose Custody in Divorce

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

by Jake Adams

In White v. White, No. 2009-CA-01701-COA, the Mississippi Court of Appeals upheld a custody award to father in an Alcorn County divorce matter where allegations of sexual abuse were made by wife against the paternal grandfather. The Chancery Court eventually found that no credible evidence existed that the sexual abuse occurred. In making its Albright findings, the Court found that the child’s well-being had been negatively impacted by the sexual-abuse allegations and that the factor regarding health of the children favored the father because of it. As to the parenting skills factor, the Court found that wife’s pursuit of the sexual-abuse allegations in part caused this factor to favor the father. The court was of the belief that wife and a grandmother were planting information of sexual abuse in the child’s mind. As a result, husband/father was awarded custody.

This is a case where unproven allegations of sexual abuse of a child harmed the accusing parent.

Does My Spouse’s Adultery Mean I Get Custody of the Children?

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

by Jake Adams

You either caught your spouse cheating or your spouse caught you. Divorce is imminent. Does the “guilty” spouse lose custody of the kids because of his or her adultery? Not necessarily.

There are many factors contemplated by the court in determining child custody. These are known as the Albright Factors, – a custody test provided by the Mississippi Supreme Court in 1983. As to marital fault, Albright specifically says:

Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards.

The Supreme Court wants the best interest of the children to prevail, and in Albright, it recognized that in some cases the better parent is not necessarily the better spouse.  So, marital fault in and of itself is not the dagger to custody hopes many people believe. However, in some cases the underlying behavior that leads to the finding of marital fault is critical. For example, in the case of a parent who participates in an adulterous relationship in the presence of his or her child, the Court will most likely find against that spouse as to “moral fitness of the parent” – a key Albright factor.

If you have questions concerning marital fault and custody, speak to an attorney as soon as possible.