Posts Tagged ‘Mississippi Child Custody’

Holiday Survival Guide

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Holidays can be filled with stress in even the most solid families but in divorced or divorcing families, they can quickly become one of the most miserable times of the year.  Finances usually come into play, as well as increased demands on time, but the misery that parents sometimes experience usually results more from their need to be inflexible and unyielding in their plans as well as the need to feel as if they “beat” their former spouse.  Unfortunately, this behavior typically results in the children enjoying the holiday less as well, making everyone unhappy.  Put the children first and leave the fighting out of the picture.  Common sense and focusing on helping the children enjoy the holiday is the best pathway to an enjoyable holiday.  Here is a good article that addresses some of the issues.

Merry Christmas!

Annulment of a Marriage

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Mississippi Code Ann. 93-7-1 states that, “All bigamous or incestuous marriages are void, and a declaration of nullity may be obtained at the suit of either party.”  A bigamous marriage is one in which one of the parties is already legally married to another.  An incestuous marriage is defined by Miss. Code Ann. 93-1-1, which states:

(1) The son shall not marry his grandmother, his mother, or his stepmother; the brother his sister; the father his daughter, or his legally adopted daughter, or his grand-daughter; the son shall not marry the daughter of his father begotten of his stepmother, or his aunt, being his father’s or mother’s sister, nor shall the children of brother or sister, or brothers and sisters intermarry being first cousins by blood. The father shall not marry his son’s widow; a man shall not marry his wife’s daughter, or his wife’s daughter’s daughter, or his wife’s son’s daughter, or the daughter of his brother or sister; and the like prohibition shall extend to females in the same degrees. All marriages prohibited by this subsection are incestuous and void.

(2) Any marriage between persons of the same gender is prohibited and null and void from the beginning. Any marriage between persons of the same gender that is valid in another jurisdiction does not constitute a legal or valid marriage in Mississippi.

Marriages that are founded on bigamy or incest are considered void  in Mississippi and may be set aside by either spouse or by third parties.  Once granted, an annulment is as if the marriage never occurred.

Mississippi Code 93-7-3 addresses situations where marriages are “voidable” by spouses but are not necessarily void unless one of the spouses raises the issue.  The statute lists five situations where a marriage is voidable if the situation exists at the time of marriage:

1.  Incurable impotency;

2.  Adjudicated mental illness or incompetence of either or both parties;

3.  Failure to meet licensing requirements if not followed by cohabitation;

4.  Lack of consent, whether through physical means, age, mental acuity, fraud or force, provided that the cause for annulment is brought within six months after discovery;

5.  Wife’s pregnancy by another, as long as the husband did not know of the pregnancy and the action is brought within six months after discovery of the pregnancy.

Children born from marriages that are annulled for reasons other than incest are considered legitimate and are governed by same rules applied in divorces.  Children born of an incestuous marriage are considered illegitimate.  Miss. Code Ann. 93-7-5.

Annulments are not as common as divorces and it is rare that a client is entitled to an annulment instead of a divorce.  However, if you feel that you may be entitled to an annulment, it is critical that you meet with an attorney immediately since there are time limitations as well as potential defenses that may prohibit an annulment.

Do Grandparents Have Visitation Rights?

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011
Prior to 2000, states across the country enacted laws that provided Grandparents broad rights of visitation with Grandchildren affected by divorce situations.  These laws were quickly challenged and eventually the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically scaled back Grandparent visitation rights
in the case of Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).  The Supreme Court held that “… the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children.” The Troxel Court found unconstitutional a State of Washington law authorizing broad grandparent visitation rights, which the Court found infringed on the fundamental constitutional right of a mother to make child-rearing decisions.  It is important to note that the Troxel holding did not invalidate all state statutes authorizing Grandparent visitation, but the case does make it clear that such statutes must be narrowly tailored to account for the protection of a parent’s fundamental constitutional right to determine how his/her children will be raised.
Likewise, the Mississippi Legislature enacted a Grandparents’ Visitation Rights Statute, codified at Mississippi Code Annotated Section 93-16-2 (1972), that provides for Grandparent visitation rights under certain circumstances.  For instance, the statute requires, among other things, proof that a grandparent has established a viable relationship with the child and that the parent or custodian of the child is unreasonably denying the grandparent visitation rights with the child.  There are other requirements of proof set forth in the statute, and not every situation is identical.
Assuming a Grandparent satisfies the statutory requirements necessary to bring a court action to establish visitation rights, the court must review the numerous factors that are set forth in the Mississippi Supreme Court case of Martin v. Coop before visitation rights are afforded. A few of these factors are:
1. The amount of disruption that extensive Grandparent visitation will have on the child’s life.
2. The age, and physical and mental health of the grandparents.
3. The moral fitness of the grandparents.
4. Any undermining of the parent’s general discipline of the child.
5. The willingness of the grandparents to accept that the rearing of the child is the responsibility of the parent.
There are a number of additional factors that a court must review.  Are you a Grandparent that desires visitation with a Grandchild affected by divorce, but you are being kept from a relationship with your Grandchild?  You may have visitation rights that can be enforced.  Give the professionals at Adams & Edens, P.A. a call today to discuss whether your desire can become a reality.

Prior to 2000, states across the country enacted laws that provided Grandparents broad rights of visitation with Grandchildren affected by divorce situations.  These laws were quickly challenged and eventually the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically scaled back Grandparent visitation rights in the case of Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).  The Supreme Court held that “… the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children.” The Troxel Court found unconstitutional a State of Washington law authorizing broad grandparent visitation rights, which the Court found infringed on the fundamental constitutional right of a mother to make child-rearing decisions.  It is important to note that the Troxel holding did not invalidate all state statutes authorizing Grandparent visitation, but the case does make it clear that such statutes must be narrowly tailored to account for the protection of a parent’s fundamental constitutional right to determine how his/her children will be raised.

Likewise, the Mississippi Legislature enacted a Grandparents’ Visitation Rights Statute, codified at Mississippi Code Annotated Section 93-16-2 (1972), that provides for Grandparent visitation rights under certain circumstances.  For instance, the statute requires, among other things, proof that a grandparent has established a viable relationship with the child and that the parent or custodian of the child is unreasonably denying the grandparent visitation rights with the child.  There are other requirements of proof set forth in the statute, and not every situation is identical.

Assuming a Grandparent satisfies the statutory requirements necessary to bring a court action to establish visitation rights, the court must review the numerous factors that are set forth in the Mississippi Supreme Court case of Martin v. Coop before visitation rights are afforded. A few of these factors are:

1. The amount of disruption that extensive Grandparent visitation will have on the child’s life.

2. The age, and physical and mental health of the grandparents.

3. The moral fitness of the grandparents

4. Any undermining of the parent’s general discipline of the child.

5. The willingness of the grandparents to accept that the rearing of the child is the responsibility of the parent.

There are a number of additional factors that a court must review.  Are you a Grandparent that desires visitation with a Grandchild affected by divorce, but you are being kept from a relationship with your Grandchild?  You may have visitation rights that can be enforced.  Give the professionals at Adams & Edens, P.A. a call today to discuss whether your desire can become a reality.

May My Child Decide the Parent with Whom He or She Wants to Live?

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

by Jake Adams

In a Mississippi divorce proceeding, if your child is 12 years old or older and both parents are determined to be fit and proper persons to have custody, the judge may consider the child’s parental preference in determining the custody arrangement that is in his or her best interest. It’s important to note that the child’s preference is only one Albright factor the court considers among many others. It is not uncommon for a court to award custody to the other parent. In either case, the court is required by statute to place on the record the reason or reasons for which the award for custody was made and is further required to explain in detail why the wishes of the child were or were not honored.

A Mississippi court may also hear the preference of the child 12 years old or older in a custody modification proceeding. However, the desire of the child alone is not enough to modify a custody order. The court must first find a material change in circumstances which adversely affects the welfare of the child before he can consider the child’s preference in a child custody modification proceeding.

Does My Spouse’s Adultery Mean I Get Custody of the Children?

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

by Jake Adams

You either caught your spouse cheating or your spouse caught you. Divorce is imminent. Does the “guilty” spouse lose custody of the kids because of his or her adultery? Not necessarily.

There are many factors contemplated by the court in determining child custody. These are known as the Albright Factors, – a custody test provided by the Mississippi Supreme Court in 1983. As to marital fault, Albright specifically says:

Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards.

The Supreme Court wants the best interest of the children to prevail, and in Albright, it recognized that in some cases the better parent is not necessarily the better spouse.  So, marital fault in and of itself is not the dagger to custody hopes many people believe. However, in some cases the underlying behavior that leads to the finding of marital fault is critical. For example, in the case of a parent who participates in an adulterous relationship in the presence of his or her child, the Court will most likely find against that spouse as to “moral fitness of the parent” – a key Albright factor.

If you have questions concerning marital fault and custody, speak to an attorney as soon as possible.

Rulings on Child Custody Should Not be Mysterious

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

by Jake Adams

In Parra v. Parra, No. 2010-CA-00339-COA, a Warren County divorce, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the child custody decision of the Chancery Court because in awarding custody of the children to the father, the Judge failed to make specific findings of fact as to the Albright Factors.

Child custody determinations in Mississippi divorce cases must be based on the Albright Factors, which are as follows:

1. The age, health, and sex of the child;

2. a determination of the parent who had the continuity of care prior to separation;

3. which parent has the best parenting skills and which has the willingness and capacity to provide primary childcare;

4. the employment of the parent and the responsibilities of that employment;

5. the physical and mental health and age of the parents;

6. the emotion ties of parent and child;

7. moral fitness of the parents;

8. the home, school, and community record of the child;

9. the preference of the child at the age sufficient to express a preference by law;

10. the stability of the home environment; and

11. other factors relevant to the parent-child relationship.

Cases involving a determination of child custody require the Court to make specific findings as to each of these factors. By requiring the trial court to make findings as to each of these factors, and the polestar consideration of the child’s best interest, the Appellate Court accomplishes two great purposes.

First, the decision of the Court is not made in the dark. The factors allow litigants to know exactly what proof they need, and after hearing the Court’s findings as to each factor can know how the Court reached its decision.

Second, the factual findings as to each of the factors allows for accurate appellate review of the lower court’s custody decision.

Thus, while establishing the Albright factors may be a daunting task for litigants and making findings as to each may be equally tedious for trial courts, the factors are a wonderful tool for protecting the most important thing of all – the children.

Adultery in Mississippi

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

by Chris Palmer

Until recently, everyone knew Tiger Woods as one of the most successful wealthiest sports figures in history. Unfortunately for his family, he is now known as an unfaithful husband whose ever-growing list of paramours will surely haunt his wife for years to come.    The damage caused by adultery though is the same, whether you are Tiger Woods or Joe the Plumber.

In Mississippi, for a spouse to prove adultery, there must be clear and convincing evidence of both an adulterous inclination and a reasonable opportunity to satisfy that inclination.  Adultery can be proven by circumstantial evidence because the secretive nature of adultery normally prevents someone from obtaining direct evidence of what occurred behind closed doors.  The evidence of adultery must be logical and be inconsistent with a theory of innocence.  A classic example would be evidence that a husband claimed to be going on a business trip to another state but was seen kissing a woman (not his wife), entering a local motel room her and not leaving until the morning.  Of course, this does not provide any evidence of what occurred in the motel room but the evidence would clearly demonstrate facts inconsistent with a theory of innocence and would likely result in a finding of adultery.

In a Mississippi divorce case, once a spouse proves adultery, the court will decide issues such as child custody and the division of assets.  So not only does the innocent spouse discover the cheating ways of the adulterous spouse, everyone takes a large financial hit with the asset division.  Sadly, however, the pain caused by adultery does not always end quickly.  Often, the destruction of trust caused by the cheating impacts people’s ability to act reasonably after a divorce is concluded.  This usually manifests itself in an unreasonable level of anger, an inability to communicate with the former spouse and frequent post-divorce contempt actions.  It can even result in a lawsuit being filed against the paramour for Alienation of Affections.  Adultery is possibly the most destructive of the divorce grounds in Mississippi.

If you are the innocent spouse in an adultery situation, it is important to speak with a lawyer quickly to determine the best way to preserve evidence if you decide to pursue a divorce and so that you will understand what is necessary should you pursue a divorce.  Even resuming normal marital relations with your spouse after learning of an affair may drastically impact your ability to pursue a divorce on the ground of adultery.

As for Tiger, his adulterous actions may cost him his family, fortune and possibly his career.  He will still remain a wealthy after a divorce, but the image he cultivated over the years that has contributed to his staggering earnings has likely been permanently tarnished.

The Beginning of Marital Bliss

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

by Chris Palmer

I ran across an article this morning that is pretty unbelievable.  The grandmother of a groom should never hear the words, “I’m going to have to choke you out” at her grandson’s wedding.  I bet this wedding video won’t be shown at family gatherings.

Who Will Get Custody of the Children?

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

by Chris Palmer

In Mississippi, a decision on which parent is awarded custody of children is a complicated process that involves the consideration of a number of very important factors, some of which are more important than others.  The factors are commonly referred to as the “Albright Factors” because they were set forth in the case Albright v. Albright, 437 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. 1983).  In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court held:

We reaffirm the rule that the polestar consideration in child custody cases is the best interest and welfare of the child. The age of the child is subordinated to that rule and is but one factor to be considered. Age should carry no greater weight than other factors to be considered, such as: health, and sex of the child; a determination of the parent that has had the continuity of care prior to the separation; which has the best parenting skills and which has the willingness and capacity to provide primary child care; the employment of the parent and responsibilities of that employment; physical and mental health and age of the parents; emotional ties of parent and child; moral fitness of parents; the home, school and community record of the child; the preference of the child at the age sufficient to express a preference by law; stability of home environment and employment of each parent, and other factors relevant to the parent-child relationship.

Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards. Relative financial situations is not controlling since the duty to support is independent of the right to custody. Differences in religion, personal values and lifestyles should not be the sole basis for custody decisions.

If you are involved in a custody situation or are thinking about filing for divorce, a review of the Albright Factors could assist you in undertanding what information is important to the judge.  However, it is critical that you discuss your situation with an attorney immediately if you feel custody will be an issue.  Failing to get sound legal advice as soon as possible could cause you to unknowingly engage in behavior that will hurt your ability to obtain custody.