Posts Tagged ‘Mississippi Divorce Lawyer’

The Decline of Traditional Morality

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

A recent survey has indicated that marriage rates are at an all time low.  In the 1960’s the median age for marriage was around 20 but now, the median age has risen to 26 for women and 29 for men. Rising divorce rates have contributed to the statistics as well as economic concerns.  What is most troubling though is that the survey reflects a sense of apathy towards marriage in general as evidenced by this quote: “A Pew survey last year determined that more than four in 10 Americans younger than 30 consider marriage passe.  ”They see it as an obselete social environment,” said D’Vera Cohn, a Pew researcher who co-wrote the analysis.”  Unfortunately, out-of-wedlock births have not followed the same path.

A study from the United Stated Department of Health and Human Resources shows that non-marital births are at greater risk of low birth weight, preterm birth and infant mortality than children born to married women.  The study also shows that children born to single mothers have more limited social and economic resources than those born to marriage.  Yet the 2007 data used in the study shows that  4 in 10 children were born out of wedlock, reflecting a 5% increase in unmarried birth since 2006, a 21% increase since 2002 and an 80% increase since 1980.

When you look at the declining marriage statistics, the changing view of marriage by young Americans and skyrocketing out-of-wedlock births, you begin to see a grim portrait of America’s future.  It appears that Americans have slowly moved toward a more narcissistic existence, one in which self-satisfaction comes first and commitment to family comes second. Why else would the statistics show declining marriage rates yet rising birth rates among unmarried people?  One only has to hang around your local family court to see the problems that result from out-of-wedlock births.  Court are jammed with single mothers begging for financial assistance from absent fathers while vehemently opposing the father’s efforts to have a relationship with his child.  If this trend continues, marriage will soon be a minority as will children born to marriage.   One has to wonder what the long term effects of this trend will have on the country if it continues since the trend sheds light on a much larger issue not addressed by the statistics – the decline of traditional views of morality.

Bible Belt States, Including Mississippi, Have Higher Divorce Rate

Monday, August 29th, 2011

by Jake Adams

Despite their  ”Bible Belt” status, Mississippi and other southern states have a higher rate of divorce than states in the Northeast. Surprising, right? Click here to read an article regarding the divorce findings of a U.S. Census Bureau report.

Some theorize that the South’s higher divorce rate is caused by getting married too young.  While I disagree with the writer’s underlying agenda to discredit the sexual values instilled by Christianity, the statistical variance between Southern divorce rates and Northeastern divorce rates should be studied. There may be a lesson to be learned from Northeasterner’s who routinely marry much later in life, the theory being that with age comes maturity, education, and a realistic approach to marriage. No one can argue that maturity, education and realism are necessary equipment for a successful marriage.

When Does Flirting Become Cheating?

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

When does online or text flirting become cheating? That is not a simple question to answer in the context of a divorce but a recent article has articulated nine red flags that may indicate that more than flirting is occurring.  While none of the listed factors are proof that a spouse is cheating, they are an excellent indicator that more investigation is needed. In fact, a study indicated that the Internet is typically the first step toward the ultimate goal of real-life cheating.  If you suspect your spouse is cheating, call us immediately because you may need to act quickly to preserve evidence critical to your divorce.

Annulment of a Marriage

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Mississippi Code Ann. 93-7-1 states that, “All bigamous or incestuous marriages are void, and a declaration of nullity may be obtained at the suit of either party.”  A bigamous marriage is one in which one of the parties is already legally married to another.  An incestuous marriage is defined by Miss. Code Ann. 93-1-1, which states:

(1) The son shall not marry his grandmother, his mother, or his stepmother; the brother his sister; the father his daughter, or his legally adopted daughter, or his grand-daughter; the son shall not marry the daughter of his father begotten of his stepmother, or his aunt, being his father’s or mother’s sister, nor shall the children of brother or sister, or brothers and sisters intermarry being first cousins by blood. The father shall not marry his son’s widow; a man shall not marry his wife’s daughter, or his wife’s daughter’s daughter, or his wife’s son’s daughter, or the daughter of his brother or sister; and the like prohibition shall extend to females in the same degrees. All marriages prohibited by this subsection are incestuous and void.

(2) Any marriage between persons of the same gender is prohibited and null and void from the beginning. Any marriage between persons of the same gender that is valid in another jurisdiction does not constitute a legal or valid marriage in Mississippi.

Marriages that are founded on bigamy or incest are considered void  in Mississippi and may be set aside by either spouse or by third parties.  Once granted, an annulment is as if the marriage never occurred.

Mississippi Code 93-7-3 addresses situations where marriages are “voidable” by spouses but are not necessarily void unless one of the spouses raises the issue.  The statute lists five situations where a marriage is voidable if the situation exists at the time of marriage:

1.  Incurable impotency;

2.  Adjudicated mental illness or incompetence of either or both parties;

3.  Failure to meet licensing requirements if not followed by cohabitation;

4.  Lack of consent, whether through physical means, age, mental acuity, fraud or force, provided that the cause for annulment is brought within six months after discovery;

5.  Wife’s pregnancy by another, as long as the husband did not know of the pregnancy and the action is brought within six months after discovery of the pregnancy.

Children born from marriages that are annulled for reasons other than incest are considered legitimate and are governed by same rules applied in divorces.  Children born of an incestuous marriage are considered illegitimate.  Miss. Code Ann. 93-7-5.

Annulments are not as common as divorces and it is rare that a client is entitled to an annulment instead of a divorce.  However, if you feel that you may be entitled to an annulment, it is critical that you meet with an attorney immediately since there are time limitations as well as potential defenses that may prohibit an annulment.

Child Support Contempt Defense

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

by Chris Palmer

The laws and procedures concerning the enforcement of child support orders greatly favor the person receiving the money.  But there are defenses.

Normally, the person receiving child  support simply alleges that child support was not properly paid and then it becomes the obligation of the payor to prove that payment was made or to prove a valid defense.  If payments were properly made, then the contempt action is dismissed.  If payments were not made, the person paying must prove a recognized and valid defense to the allegation of nonpayment in order to avoid being held in contempt of court.

One of the main defenses to a charge of contempt (other than proving payment) is that the nonpayment is based on an inability to pay the child support.  There has to be a genuine inability to pay and not a situation where the paying party overextended themselves through frivolous spending.  This means that the party must spend money on only basic needs and then apply everything else to the child support payment.  A defendant that claims inability to pay but on cross examination reveals the amount of money spent of non-necessities (beer, cigarettes, etc.) often leaves the courtroom in handcuffs.

Ambiguity in a child support award can also be a valid defense.  For example, a court order that requires a person to pay “14% of their monthly income” would be unenforceable and too ambiguous since it would be subject to multiple interpretations.  Support awards should contain a specific dollar amount in order to avoid ambiguity in interpretation.

While there are other valid and acceptable defenses, the best defense is to avoid getting behind in the payment of child support in the first place.  Finding yourself on the wrong side of a contempt complaint can result in incarceration, wage garnishment and having to pay the other party’s legal fees.   If finances create the necessity of a “financial juggling act” when monthly bills come due, it is far better to not pay a credit card bill than it is to not pay child support.

Do I Need a Lawyer?

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Can’t I get a divorce by just filling out some forms?  I saw online where I can get the divorce forms for a lot less than the cost of a lawyer, is that a bad idea?  These are questions that come up periodically and the answer to both questions is “yes.”  To explain, a no-fault divorce can be very simple for a lawyer to put together for a client and can take very little time by the lawyer to do so.  But, the final product you see is the culmination of years of education, experience and familiarity with the differing requirements of chancery court judges along with careful drafting of documents that address the client’s unique circumstances  For divorces, there is no “one size fits all” form.

Proper preparation of divorce documents is critical.  Lawyers look at both the immediate goal of obtaining a divorce as well as the long-term consequences of the divorce judgment.  Usually, parties that try to get divorced without the benefit of a lawyer create documents that are so awful, they often end up being completely unenforceable or void.  If that happens, it is almost certain that the parties will end up paying much more money in legal fees to repair the mess that they would spent to do it correctly in the first place.

The decisions you make in a divorce, and the documents that result, can control aspects of your family for tens of years and drastically impact your finances and property.  Nothing that important should be relegated to a do-it-yourself kit.  While there are certainly legal documents you can create without a lawyer that will serve you well, in a divorce, there are no short cuts.  Do it right the first time to avoid major problems in the long-term.

How do I Increase or Decrease Child Support Payments?

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

by Chris Palmer

When child support payments are set by court order and there is a desire to either increase or decrease the amount of the payments, the person seeking the change must show that a substantial and material change in the  circumstances of either the parents or the child has occurred since the date of the child support judgment.  The process is begun by the party seeking the modification filing a Complaint for Modification and having it, along with a summons and court date, served on the defendant.  In reviewing a request to change the child support amount, the court considers the increased needs of older children, higher expenses, a child’s medical needs, the parents’ financial situation, the health and needs of the parents, the monthly living expenses of the party ordered to pay child support, the parents’ tax obligations, the respective costs of each party’s residence and any other facts and circumstances the court considers relevant.  However, the most common reason for either party seeking a change in child support amount is a change in the payor’s income.

A modification cannot relitigate issues already decided in the original decree.  Modifications must be based on facts that occurred after the court established the original child support order.  If you were not satisfied with the original order then the remedy was to ask the court to reconsider and/or appeal the decision, but there are strict time frames in which that must be done.  Also, the change in circumstances sought to be used as the basis for a change in child support amount must be unanticipated at the time of the original decree.

Lifestyle decisions cannot be used to justify a child support modification.  For example, a payor cannot purchase a new car and then claim he should pay less child support because the car loan is too expensive.  Additionally, a payor cannot have child support reduced because he or she decides to have more children.

Typically, a modification is brought because the person receiving child support discovers that the payor has received an increase in pay.  If so, a substantial increase in pay will justify a modification with the court considering the child support guidelines.  Likewise, if a payor receives a substantial decrease in pay, a downward modification may be appropriate.  However, if the payor created the decrease in pay, the situation may be a little more difficult to address because courts are traditionally reluctant to take child support away from a custodial parent simply because the payor wanted to take a lower paying job.  In those situations, the court is likely to pay close attention to the motivation behind the payor’s actions.

If a modification is sought, it is important to act quickly because a modification is generally only effective from the date of the complaint to modify (at the earliest) or the date of the court order modifying the amount.

Internet Infidelity

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

by Chris Palmer

Unless you have been living in a hole with no access to news, you have undoubtedly heard of the scandal involving Congressman Anthony Weiner, who recently resigned after it was revealed that the married congressman had sexual conversations with females, sent females lewd photographs of himself and then publicly blamed the fiasco on a “hacker.” What started as a foray into the temptations of internet anonymity and access, ended with public embarrassment, career destruction and possible divorce. Weiner’s public self-destruction teaches the average married person a valuable lesson in trust, proper marital boundaries and the use of technology to facilitate “internet infidelity.”

Engaging in sexual conversations, flirting and conversing with someone other than your spouse via email, Twitter, Facebook or text messaging destroys the trust between spouses. Often, the ease of communication can lead to very intimate “electronic” relationships that give the appearance of infidelity.  In my opinion, the presence of an “internet infidelity” can be just as devastating to a marriage as a physical affair because the innocent spouse will always believe that a physical affair has occurred or is in the process of occurring. Once the suspicion of an affair takes hold, a divorce complaint often follows since the discovery of adultery usually begins with suspicion.

Adultery is a ground for divorce in Mississippi and is defined as “voluntary sexual intercourse of a married person with a person other than the offender’s spouse.” Owen v. Gerity, 422 So. 2d 284, 287 (Miss. 1982). Because of the secretive nature of adultery, direct proof is not required and one may prove adultery by circumstantial evidence. Essentially, to prove adultery by circumstantial evidence, the proof must show (1) a spouse’s adulterous nature, which usually involves infatuation or adulterous inclination and (2) a reasonable opportunity to act on the infatuation or inclination.  Facts that support a finding of adultery have been secretive actions by a spouse, frequent telephone calls and letters to a suspected paramour.  Clearly, engaging in intimate conversations with someone not your spouse over the internet, by text message or other means will likely satisfy the element of proving infatuation or adulterous inclination.  However, unless you are able to prove a reasonable oppurtunity to act on the infatuation or adulterous inclination, then you will be unable to obtain a divorce on the basis of adultery (unless there is an admission or some form of direct proof).

Engaging in actions such as those committed by Anthony Weiner may not constitute grounds for divorce alone, but it is likely that with proper investigation, proof of reasonable opportunity may be discovered.  If you suspect your spouse is committing adultery and you are considering divorce, it is important that you speak with a lawyer before confronting your spouse.  With proper legal advice, steps may be taken to preserve evidence and to make sure you are able to present the strongest case possible. Additionally, if you suspect adultery, it is critical that you do not resume a sexual relationship with your spouse because if you do, the law considers you to have forgiven your spouse of the adultery and you will be unable to use the adultery as a ground for divorce. You may ultimately decide that forgiveness is the best course of action for your family but you should first seek legal advice from a competent divorce attorney so that you have the knowledge to make an informed decision as to your marriage.

The Tax Police

Friday, November 19th, 2010

by Chris Palmer

This isn’t really divorce related, but worth addressing.  Wesley Snipes looks like he’ll be spending the next few years in prison for tax evasion. He was convicted of tax evasion but while he appealed the conviction he was out on bail.  Now that the appeal is concluded, so is his freedom, at least for a while.  While Snipes intentionally sought to evade taxation, and will pay a heavy price, normal people can find themselves with a financially devastating tax situation if they neglect their taxes.  While not a criminal offense normally, failing to file returns or to pay the required tax results in penalties and interest and a debt collector that you really can’t hang up on.  In the middle of a divorce, the last thing a divorcing person needs is delinquent tax debt.  File your returns, pay your taxes and avoid significant financial consequences.  Remember – the IRS will still be married to you even if your spouse is not.