Posts Tagged ‘Mississippi Divorce Lawyer’
Thursday, November 4th, 2010
by Chris Palmer
Recently, a company called SafeGuard Marketing Management, Inc. began selling a product called “Divorce Insurance.” You certainly have to admire the ingenuity of a company to come up with a product like this. However, the value of the product is questionable both morally and financially. If you are contemplating marrying the love of your life, but at the same time anticipating a divorce, then you should probably just skip the pain and not get married. The concept of “divorce insurance” trivializes marriage and in my view, encourages people to make no effort to resolve their differences. In fact, it would actually provide an incentive to divorce and contribute to the destruction of many families. If potential spouses want “insurance” against divorce, then their money would be better spent by investing in premarital counseling and marriage counseling, if problems arise. Here is an article written by an attorney in California that expands further on the topic.
Tags: Adultery, Alimony, Attorney, Brandon, Brandon Divorce Attorney, Child Support, Custody, Death and Divorce, Divorce Grounds, divorce insurance, Divorce Property Division in Mississippi, Financial Security, Irreconcilable Differences, Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Joint Account, Joint Accounts, marriage counseling, Mississippi, Mississippi Child Custody, Mississippi Child Support, Mississippi Child Support Collection, Mississippi Child Supprt, Mississippi Custody, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Grounds, Mississippi divorce Joint Accounts, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi Divorce Tax Issues, No-Fault Divorce, pre-marital counseling, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer, Taxation Issues in Divorce
Posted in General | No Comments »
Thursday, August 19th, 2010
by Chris Palmer
Divorce can be devastating financially as incomes are split, property is sold at a loss and the financial burden of single parenting takes effect. For this reason, the financial toll must always be considered when couples are considering a divorce. According to a recent article on findings by the Census Bureau, a study over a period of 15 years showed that couples who remained married during that time built up nearly twice the net worth of people who remained single. Considering the visible toll on finances caused by divorce and the findings by the Census Bureau, a stark picture is painted for those that end their marriages. Of course, situations differ among couples and a thorough evaluation of your finances is a critical component in understanding the pros and cons of divorce and reconciliation.
Tags: Brandon Divorce Attorney, Child Support, Divorce, Financial Security, Irreconcilable Differences, Joint Accounts, Mississippi Custody, Mississippi Divorce, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi Divorce Tax Issues, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer
Posted in General | No Comments »
Thursday, August 5th, 2010
by Chris Palmer
The typical scenario when a spouse learns that the other has done something that destroys the marriage is that the innocent spouse meets with a lawyer, who guides the spouse through the divorce process. Occasionally, though, you find that while listening to the “outrage” that a client expresses over learning that their spouse has had an affair you also learn that your “innocent” client has also been having an affair. So what do you do if a client wants a divorce but both spouses are committing adultery? An agreed resolution on the ground of Irreconcilable Differences would be the preferable outcome, but litigation may be the only option in some circumstances.
The Mississippi Supreme Court recently addressed a similar scenario in Jenkins v. Jenkins. In Jenkins, the court was faced with a situation where the lower court granted a person a divorce on the ground of Habitual, Cruel and Inhuman Treatment. The guilty spouse tried to defend the charge by claiming the defense of “recrimination”, which is a common-law defense that states if each party proves a fault ground for divorce then neither is entitled to a divorce. The defense of recrimination has been altered by Miss. Code Ann. 93-5-3, which allows a court to grant a divorce, even if both parties prove a fault ground for divorce, by determining which spouse’s actions constituted the proximate cause of the destruction of the marriage. The Mississippi Supreme Court determined that although the wife admitted committing adultery, the trial evidence showed that the husband’s habitual, cruel and inhuman treatment was the cause of the divorce, not the wife’s adultery, and that the lower court properly denied the husband’s recrimination defense.
Although a scenario where both parties are committing actions that constitute divorce grounds is not the preferable situation, a spouse may still be able to obtain a divorce without his/her spouse’s consent if the facts are supportive. If you find yourself in this situation, speaking with an attorney to help analyze the proximate cause of the destruction of the marriage very early on is vital.
Tags: Adultery, Attorney, Brandon, Brandon Divorce Attorney, Brandon Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Chancery, Child Support Guidelines, Custody, Desertion, Divorce, Divorce Grounds, Habitual Cruel and Inhuman Treatment, Irreconcilable Differences, Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Custody, Mississippi Divorce, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Grounds, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, No-Fault Divorce, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer, Recrimination
Posted in Grounds for Divorce | No Comments »
Thursday, July 8th, 2010
by Chris Palmer
A very important, but often overlooked, tool in avoiding nasty divorces is a thorough prenuptial agreement. Here is an excellent article on the need for prenuptial agreements in estate planning but it is just as applicable in the divorce context.
Tags: Brandon Divorce Attorney, Death and Divorce, Divorce, Financial Security, Irreconcilable Differences, Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Joint Account, Mississippi Divorce, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi divorce Joint Accounts, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi Divorce Tax Issues, Mississippi Estates, Prenuptial Agreements, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer
Posted in Prenuptial Agreements | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 19th, 2010
by Chris Palmer
Everyone knows divorces can get pretty expensive. A department store has come up with a solution to help newly divorced people get back on their feet – a divorce registry. The department store has figured out that with people basically losing half of their belongings in a divorce, family and friends may want to purchase them a gift, much as they do for a wedding, so that items such as irons, toasters and the like may be replenished. I’m not sure how successful this will be, but it definitely draws attention to the impact a divorce has on items that are often overlooked.
When a couple divorces in Mississippi, all marital property must be divided. For ease of reference, marital property is essentially all items purchased or accumulated during the marriage by either party, although there are exceptions. While most people focus on the larger items like vehicles, televisions and furniture, households are filled with all sorts of items that must also be divided. A person may not realize until after a separation, how much replacement of household items costs. These are costs that are in addition to attorneys fees and income lost from the other spouse.
When separating, it is advisable for both spouses, assuming they can agree, to go through the marital residence together and divide all the items room by room. A list can be created at the same time so each will have a record. Although a person often is anxious to move on and only focuses on the big items, spending a little time on the little things will save you a lot of money down the road.
Tags: Brandon Divorce Attorney, Brandon Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Divorce Property Division in Mississippi, Irreconcilable Differences, Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Divorce, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi Marital Property, Mississippi Property Division, No-Fault Divorce, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer
Posted in Division of Marital Property | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 15th, 2009
by Chris Palmer
Until recently, everyone knew Tiger Woods as one of the most successful wealthiest sports figures in history. Unfortunately for his family, he is now known as an unfaithful husband whose ever-growing list of paramours will surely haunt his wife for years to come. The damage caused by adultery though is the same, whether you are Tiger Woods or Joe the Plumber.
In Mississippi, for a spouse to prove adultery, there must be clear and convincing evidence of both an adulterous inclination and a reasonable opportunity to satisfy that inclination. Adultery can be proven by circumstantial evidence because the secretive nature of adultery normally prevents someone from obtaining direct evidence of what occurred behind closed doors. The evidence of adultery must be logical and be inconsistent with a theory of innocence. A classic example would be evidence that a husband claimed to be going on a business trip to another state but was seen kissing a woman (not his wife), entering a local motel room her and not leaving until the morning. Of course, this does not provide any evidence of what occurred in the motel room but the evidence would clearly demonstrate facts inconsistent with a theory of innocence and would likely result in a finding of adultery.
In a Mississippi divorce case, once a spouse proves adultery, the court will decide issues such as child custody and the division of assets. So not only does the innocent spouse discover the cheating ways of the adulterous spouse, everyone takes a large financial hit with the asset division. Sadly, however, the pain caused by adultery does not always end quickly. Often, the destruction of trust caused by the cheating impacts people’s ability to act reasonably after a divorce is concluded. This usually manifests itself in an unreasonable level of anger, an inability to communicate with the former spouse and frequent post-divorce contempt actions. It can even result in a lawsuit being filed against the paramour for Alienation of Affections. Adultery is possibly the most destructive of the divorce grounds in Mississippi.
If you are the innocent spouse in an adultery situation, it is important to speak with a lawyer quickly to determine the best way to preserve evidence if you decide to pursue a divorce and so that you will understand what is necessary should you pursue a divorce. Even resuming normal marital relations with your spouse after learning of an affair may drastically impact your ability to pursue a divorce on the ground of adultery.
As for Tiger, his adulterous actions may cost him his family, fortune and possibly his career. He will still remain a wealthy after a divorce, but the image he cultivated over the years that has contributed to his staggering earnings has likely been permanently tarnished.
Tags: Adultery, Alienation of Affections, Brandon Divorce Attorney, Custody, Divorce Grounds, Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Child Custody, Mississippi Custody, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Grounds, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer, Tiger Woods
Posted in General, Grounds for Divorce | No Comments »
Thursday, November 12th, 2009
by Chris Palmer
I ran across an article this morning that is pretty unbelievable. The grandmother of a groom should never hear the words, “I’m going to have to choke you out” at her grandson’s wedding. I bet this wedding video won’t be shown at family gatherings.
Tags: Brandon, Brandon Divorce Attorney, Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Child Custody, Mississippi Child Support, Mississippi Child Support Collection, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Grounds, Mississippi divorce Joint Accounts, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi Divorce Tax Issues, Taxation Issues in Divorce, Wedding
Posted in General | No Comments »
Wednesday, November 11th, 2009
by Chris Palmer
In divorce cases, there is a common misunderstanding among divorcing spouses about the taxation issues associated with payments for both child support and alimony.
Child support is defined by the Internal Revenue Code as a “payment which the terms of the divorce or separation instrument fix (in terms of an amount of money or a part of the payment) as a sum which is payable for the support of children of the payor spouse.” 26 U.S.C.A. 71(c)(1). Basically, child support is a payment ordered in a divorce decree that the divorce decree labels as child support. There are situations where payments labeled as “child supprt” may not qualify as child support but we won’t get into those right now. The tax code treats any payment of child support, so long as it meets the requirements of Section 71, as a non-taxable event, meaning that the receiving spouse does not include the child support in gross income (which means it is received tax-free) and the paying spouse receives no deduction for the payment of child support. 26 U.S.C.A. 71.
Alimony, on the other hand, is considered income to the receiving spouse (must pay taxes on it just as if earned at a job) and may be considered a deduction by the paying spouse. 26 U.S.C.A. 71. There are situations where the Internal Revenue Service may consider a spouse to be receiving alimony even if the payment is not called alimony. Obviously, this would be a huge problem if the receiving spouse had not been including the alimony payments on her income tax return. We’ll get into alimony is more detail in a later post.
Many people try to prepare their own divorce documents to save money on legal fees but often their efforts to save money result in unintended tax consequences. It definitely pays in the long run to get the divorce documents drafted correctly. You do not want to find out during an audit that the tax-free money you’ve been receiving is not really tax-free.
Tags: Alimony, Brandon Divorce Attorney, Child Support, Divorce, Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi divorce Joint Accounts, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Mississippi Divorce Tax Issues, No-Fault Divorce, Taxation, Taxation Issues in Divorce
Posted in Alimony, Child Support | No Comments »
Friday, October 23rd, 2009
by Chris Palmer
In Mississippi, a decision on which parent is awarded custody of children is a complicated process that involves the consideration of a number of very important factors, some of which are more important than others. The factors are commonly referred to as the “Albright Factors” because they were set forth in the case Albright v. Albright, 437 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. 1983). In Albright, the Mississippi Supreme Court held:
We reaffirm the rule that the polestar consideration in child custody cases is the best interest and welfare of the child. The age of the child is subordinated to that rule and is but one factor to be considered. Age should carry no greater weight than other factors to be considered, such as: health, and sex of the child; a determination of the parent that has had the continuity of care prior to the separation; which has the best parenting skills and which has the willingness and capacity to provide primary child care; the employment of the parent and responsibilities of that employment; physical and mental health and age of the parents; emotional ties of parent and child; moral fitness of parents; the home, school and community record of the child; the preference of the child at the age sufficient to express a preference by law; stability of home environment and employment of each parent, and other factors relevant to the parent-child relationship.
Marital fault should not be used as a sanction in custody awards. Relative financial situations is not controlling since the duty to support is independent of the right to custody. Differences in religion, personal values and lifestyles should not be the sole basis for custody decisions.
If you are involved in a custody situation or are thinking about filing for divorce, a review of the Albright Factors could assist you in undertanding what information is important to the judge. However, it is critical that you discuss your situation with an attorney immediately if you feel custody will be an issue. Failing to get sound legal advice as soon as possible could cause you to unknowingly engage in behavior that will hurt your ability to obtain custody.
Tags: Brandon Divorce Attorney, Brandon Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Chancery, Child Support Guidelines, Court, Custody, Divorce, Jackson Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Child Custody, Mississippi Child Support Collection, Mississippi Custody, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Grounds, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Visitation
Posted in Child Custody, FAQ | No Comments »
Thursday, October 8th, 2009
by Chris Palmer
An article was posted on FOX News this morning that leaves you waiting for the punchline. Unfortunately, it is not a joke. The headline reads, “Florida Priest Seeks Custody of Child From Stripper.” The article needs no explanation other than to say that issues pertaining to custody of children and child support know no societal, economic or professional boundaries and that when you think you’ve heard it all, you soon realize that you have not. A link to a more thorough article on the matter is here.
Tags: Brandon Divorce Attorney, Chancery, Child Support, Custody, FOX News, Lawyer, Mississippi, Mississippi Child Custody, Mississippi Child Support Collection, Mississippi Child Supprt, Mississippi Divorce Attorney, Mississippi Divorce Grounds, Mississippi Divorce Law, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer, Paternity, Rankin County Divorce Lawyer, Restraining Order
Posted in Child Custody, Child Support, General, Modification of Child Support, Modification of Custody | No Comments »